1
The Trust Trap
The Trust Trap
Lisätiedot
CAN TRUSTED SOURCES BE WRONG?
In Activity 2, you explored how fake news can be identified through sources, authors, dates, clickbait, and images. But what happens when the information comes from a famous and trusted media source?
One article claims that starving polar bears are clear evidence of global warming. Another source argues that the story is misleading and emotionally manipulative.
So… who should we believe?
What this flash mob shows that through movement and visual storytelling, it encourages viewers to pause, think critically, question what they see, and verify information through multiple sources before believing or sharing it.
Controlled Opposition
Sometimes people are given the impression that there are only two extreme sides to choose from. The debate may look free and open, but both sides can still distract from deeper questions, alternative perspectives, or real solutions.
This idea is known as controlled opposition — when opposition appears independent or rebellious, but still operates inside limits that keep people emotionally divided, distracted, or easier to influence.
Throughout history, powerful groups, political movements, and media systems have sometimes used conflict, fear, and division to shape public opinion. When people are constantly pushed to “pick a side,” they may stop asking bigger questions or thinking critically about the full picture.
How it works:
- Illusion of choice: Sometimes governments create “fake” opposition groups so it looks like people have different political choices, but in reality the same people still control everything.
- Channeling energy: People in power may lead or control protests themselves so they can keep people busy, limit how far the movement goes, and stop real change from happening.
- Discrediting dissent: Governments or powerful groups may send people into protests to act violently or say extreme things. This makes the whole movement look bad and causes others to stop taking the real concerns seriously.
A modern example often discussed by media analysts is the Johnny Depp–Amber Heard trial. Millions of people followed the case on social media, with many feeling pressured to support one side or the other. While the conflict itself was real, critics argue that the intense focus on "Team Depp" versus "Team Heard" encouraged people to view a complex situation as a simple two-sided battle, leaving less room for nuanced discussion or broader questions about media influence, online behavior, and domestic violence.
Another example often discussed by political scientists is how some authoritarian governments allow “opposition” candidates or parties to run in elections, but heavily control media, funding, laws, or outcomes so the ruling group still stays in power.
The Ripple Effect
The performance shows how information changes as it passes from person to person. The first dancer creates the “original message.” During the first part, the second, third and last dancer copies it correctly, but with small personal differences. During the next wave, the dance begins to shift completely — movements change, timing changes, emotions change, and eventually each dancer performs a different version of the same story.
This reflects what often happens with gossip, viral news, and online narratives:
- people remember different details,
- add their own interpretation,
- exaggerate certain parts,
- or unconsciously reshape the message.
The ending suggests that after enough repetition, people may still believe they are sharing the “same truth,” even though the original message has already transformed into something else entirely.
It also highlights how confidence and repetition can make altered information feel believable, even when accuracy is slowly disappearing.
Are you interested to learn more about the topic:
- Explore EUROPEANS AGAINST FAKE NEWS where you can find sets of visual, audio, and other materials created to spread the message about the importance of fighting fake news.
- Example of debunking fake news by FRANCE 24 - Surge of misinformation on Lampedusa migration influx
Hanki aktiviteetti-merkki
Truth Seeker Hanki tämä merkki
By completing this activity, you will develop deeper critical thinking and media literacy skills by exploring how information can become distorted, emotionally framed, or manipulated — even when it comes from trusted or well-known sources.
Learners will:
- understand why it is important to compare multiple sources before forming opinions,
- recognize how emotions, repetition, and group thinking can influence belief,
- explore how misinformation evolves through the “ripple effect,”
- reflect on how division and extreme narratives can shape public opinion,
- and strengthen their ability to think independently instead of automatically “taking sides.”
Through flash mobs, real-world examples, reflection tasks, and discussions, you will gain practical skills for navigating complex information responsibly and questioning narratives with curiosity, balance, and critical awareness.
Sinun täytyy suorittaa 1 tehtävä saadaksesi merkin
Tehtävät
Tehtävä nro.1
Vastauksen vahvistanut: Yksi aktiviteetin järjestäjä
Task 1. CAN TRUSTED SOURCES BE WRONG?
Do you know any other case where major media or science outlets reported stories that were later shown to be exaggerated, misleading, or inaccurate? Write down your examples and reliable sources discussing how the claims were later found to be false or unsupported.
Tehtävä nro.2
Vastauksen vahvistanut: Yksi aktiviteetin järjestäjä
Task 2. Controlled Opposition
Read the examples of controlled opposition above.
Now imagine you are observing a debate, protest, political conflict, or online argument.
Ask yourself:
- Are people encouraged to choose only between two extreme sides?
- Could the conflict distract from bigger questions?
- Who really benefits from division and emotional reactions? And how?
- Are alternative perspectives ignored or silenced?
Write down one real-life example (historical, political, media-related, online or cases from popular culture such as Taylor Swift vs. Scooter Braun) where you think people may have been pushed into “taking sides.”
Tehtävä nro.3
Vastauksen vahvistanut: Yksi aktiviteetin järjestäjä
Task 3. The Ripple Effect
Share a personal experience where you witnessed the “ripple effect” of gossip, rumors, or misinformation spreading around you. It does not have to be in the news only, it can be something that happened in your school friend group, local community.
Tehtävä nro.4
Vastauksen vahvistanut: Yksi aktiviteetin järjestäjä
Task 4. My Analytics
Watch this flash mob:
As you watch, think about how the movements change and spread from person to person. Then share your opinion:
- What message do you think the flash mob is trying to communicate?
Järjestäjät
TiPovej!
Badge issuer recognized with
Käytössä soittolistoilla
Truth or Trap?
TiPovej!Luotu Ljubljana City of Learning
Badgecraft isännöi tätä alustaa ja kehittää sitä yhdessä johtavien koulutusorganisaatioiden kanssa. Euroopan unionin Erasmus+ -ohjelmasta myönnettiin osarahoitusta tämän foorumin ensimmäisen version rakentamiseen. Ota yhteyttä support@badgecraft.eu.
Vaihda toiseen kieleen:
